Thursday, March 1, 2012

Systemic alternatives and local activism – David McNally

From "David McNally: The Global Economic Meltdown", Chapter Four of Capital and Its Discontents: Conversations with Radical Thinkers in a Time of Tumult by Sasha Lilley (PM Press, 2011)

SL: Are you concerned at all about a crisis of ideas on the left? One segment of the left seems to be pushing for a return to the Keynesian welfare state, which characterized the social democracies following WWII and to a lesser extent the U.S. And, on the other hand, you have those focusing very specifically on local struggles and less on a wholesale, systemic agenda for transformation. Does it concern you that there aren't ideas currently in circulation that really would be able to address this crisis?

DM: Yes... There's a danger that ... those who are speaking to what we may call systemic alternatives are really trying to do that in Keynesian terms. That is to say they are really imagining that we can go back to, say 1940s, 1950s, early 1960s styles of capitalism with much more regulation. ... I think that it does not address the world in which we live. It's just a dead end for the left. ...

The danger then is that the alternative is seen as a certain kind of local activism, and believe me, I'm a big believer in digging in and ... building resistance movements where we are ... But I think we ... actually squander certain opportunities right now if we're not putting forward a wider anticapitalist systemic approach. In other words, raising issues about:
  • how an economy might be reorganized,
  • how global relations between North and South might be reorganized,
  • popularizing ideas like social ownership, workers' self-managed production, the reduced work-week across the board,
  • the redistribution of wealth from North to South,
  • the green economy, and so on
–really developing an integrated response which isn't Keynesian but which really does speak to the global realities in which we find ourselves today.

[T]hat discussion is clearly happening in other parts of the world. The statement by the World Social Movement's meeting in Brazil as part of the World Social Forum was very much exactly to that point. They are trying to move toward that kind of analysis and perspective. But I think in North America in particular we've tended to lag behind. I think the Latin American movements are ahead of us on that in particular. I think the activist left in some of the European countries, particularly France, are ahead of us on that.

[L]ocal activism is crucial because that's where you build the actual resistance movements of the day, but at the same time this is a moment for the really serious left to think on a much wider scale as to how to begin to popularize alternative economics and anticapitalist forms of organization. Because this is an opportunity where we don't want our voices to be either lost because we're only doing the local activism or to be speaking in the outmoded language of Keynesianism.

In that sense, the slogan which has come out of Venezuela about a socialism for the twenty-first century seems to me to be more urgent than ever before. It's an opportunity to really redefine socialism and anticapitalism in terms of its original democratic commitments and its internationalist commitments. I think there's a lot of space for that if we can figure out how to do it.

Examples of Resistance

For our final meeting, our primary topic is to consider the range of responses and resistance to the global economic crisis, and to project from the previous discussions what might be the economic environment for collective liberation in the next period.

Preparing for our discussion, the thinking (journaling? free writing?) part is more important than the reading, which can only be a small sample of the hundreds of thousands of activist projects taking place.

Nevertheless, I have picked out instances which range from the ultra-local (Occupy Bernal) to a small nation (Iceland, as we mentioned last time), to international (Bolivarian revolution) to abstract ("The Global Economic Meltdown" in Capital and Its Discontents). Below are links to articles which address these. I would also encourage everyone to follow Sharon's suggestion to look over the very substantial Catalyzing Liberation Toolkit prepared by Catalyst for Occupy organizers, available as a 184 page PDF file from the Occupy Resource Center of their website, collectiveliberation.org.

About Occupy Bernal:
About Iceland (Mickey may recommend something additional):
About "21st Century Socialism," "Communitarian Socialism" and new Internationals:
About Keynesian reforms versus collective liberation:
  • A brief excerpt from David McNalley in Capital and Its Discontents: Conversations with Radical Thinkers in a Time of Tumult by Sasha Lilley (PM Press, 2011) (sent by email).
For additional reading, Sharon recommends  a pair of long letters from some of the leaders of the California prison hunger strike: